The takeaway is that choosing any of these pastes for usage will ultimately come down to a specific choice for each person, but price seems to be the first logical decision, then followed by performance. We could test these same pastes 1000 times over and the order might change slightly each time given slightly different system logging, however, each should be within the same incredibly close grouping in terms of overall average temp. The 'place' of a compound listed is far less significant and only meant to order based on the averages readings done during testing and the averages of all core temps across all like tests for a chart. The primary differences are only seen between liquid metals and traditional pastes where the actual thermal medium is very different with significant chemical makeup and showing a decided change, although still within a few degrees Celsius overall. We're looking changes in decimal points between many of these, which is the primary point of the article and the findings - many compounds perform quite similarly when tested under the same testing conditions, or to put it better yet, do not give a significant advantage over a competitor brand. We're talking that the difference between '4th place and 11th place' might be less than 1C of overall change. Understandable question, but the real item here for discussion is that there are very, very slim margins of difference which are based on load averages, but still well within a very small window.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |